All We'll Hear In 2010 Is Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Soon the Democrats will have their healthcare victory. It may be a hollow victory that barely resembles their initial goals, but it will be declared momentous and beneficial to all Americans. We will have more laws and taxes for the sake of illusive healthcare improvements. Any consequences of the legislation, such as debt, increased taxation and job losses, will be several years away, so the celebration can begin.

With some sort of a healthcare victory behind Obama and the Democrats, they can turn their attention to what Americans are really concerned about. That is the economy and job creation. The party in power has been slow to realize that healthcare reform is not the voters number one priority. In 2010 the Democrats will innundate us with job creation legislation.

Just like healthcare costs and coverage, job creation can either be nurtured simply and effectively, or politicians can talk big, tinker, and accomplish little. Rest assured, Obama will get a jobs bill and victory will be declared. No, he won't accomplish an improvement in employment by simply lowering corporate income taxes or the highest personal, marginal rates paid by business owners of Sub Ss or LLCs. That would never happen as it would make sense. Jobs legislation will need to be targeted so social goals and constituencies can be served. Power must be preserved. The mid-term elections must maintain the Democratic majority and 10+ percent unemployment will not accomplish that. So, let the jobs tinkering begin.

What private sector growth can Democrats tolerate? The list is short: green jobs in sustainable energy, unionized workforces in manufacturing, the entertainment industry, design and construction of government building projects, data processing that consolidates and improves medical recordkeeping, and agriculture. These constituencies are apt to receive extra assistance.

We will see a general investment tax credit for the purchase of capital goods or additional employment. Capital goods purchases and employment growth in targeted industries will see an expanded tax incentive. Wind and solar projects, energy efficient appliances and transportation, almost any item manufactured and exported by a union member, will attain special status in the name of job creation. Rebuilding the construction industry with unionized labor by funding more school and transportation projects. None of this will be called stimulus as that has become synonymous with wasteful spending. In 2010 we will have job creation. Democrats will attempt to sound like Republicans.

Capital goods manufacturers that export will see an ITC driven sales boom on top of the weak dollar benefit.The likes of Cat, Deere,Trinity and Valmont, among others, will see revenue growth. Even in a "U" recovery some stocks will appreciate and select American manufacturing companies may benefit from Obama's next victory. Forget about the additional debt and taxation that will accompany, like healthcare reform, the job creation "success"as it won't cause credit and inflationary problems for several years. It will be a "victory" or the Republicans will get a chance to get change correct.

Back to stocks, Deere, while certainly not cheaply priced, is an unionized exporter that serves the agriculture and construction industries and might be a place to park a few dollars while Obama creates jobs,jobs,jobs.

SMART BALANCE REVISITED

Last month I wrote a positive article on why I liked Smart balance. At that time SMBL was selling for $5.90 and I found that figure a reasonable entry point. Two important things have happened since that time. First, the price declined steadily to a low of around $5 and change, making it nearly 20 percent cheaper. Second, today the company announced that it was rolling out its milk products nationwide beginning in January, 2010.

I liked the company at $5.90, so I was very happy to see it go lower. I now own more shares. The milk rollout is exciting. The company says the results of their test market this year in Florida was very favorable. That's good news as milk is a bigger market than spreads. Second, it's good to have feedback that some consumers are still willing to buy premium products in a very difficult economy.

The rollout will eat up some cash, but the company's structure lets them tackle nationwide distribution relatively conservative. Remember, SMBL doesn't own manufacturing or packaging plants. It's all contracted and they announced that they have assembled their dairy partners for the milk venture. The success of the spreads assures shelf space in the milk case.

Nationwide milk distribution and consumer acceptance positions the company well in its quest to become a billion dollar organization. Steve Hughes and his team have the expertise and nads to take on a major, although calculated, expansion in the midst of a difficult economy. They continue to execute their well thought out plan.

I remain encouraged by SMBL's progress and can't wait for 5 years to elapse. Shareholders will be nicely rewarded.

THIS FEELS FAMILIAR AND LOUSY

The past 5 or 6 trading days have been miserable. If I was fully invested my nausea would resemble the swine flu. While I've taken my inoculation of holding cash, writing calls, and shorting a few names, the sick feeling still overwhelms me as I watch the equities that I own crater.

The sweaty brow, clammy hands, and ache in the pit of my stomach are symptomatic of my feelings last Spring as the market plummeted. Is this downward move just a minor, sideways adjustment or the onset of a major correction that will again test men's nerves?

We've only slid down to 9750 on the Dow and 1042 on the S&P so the bulk of the market's recovery is intact. Yet it feels as if we've fallen off a cliff. Rebounding equities have felt so good after the misery of the recession and credit crisis. Will investors panic and attempt to avoid a repeat of the March lows by selling out or will they view a 10-15% correction as a buying opportunity and start pushing prices upward again?

My guess, and it is obviously just a guess, is that the bias is still positive and after some of the gains are protected and taken off the table, the buying will resume. But the names will be different. The crappiest of stocks have done the best in the rally, and even the boldest investor should sense that it is time to become more cautious. Speculative names will be replaced with reasonable investments.

Over the next 6 months I still believe we will head lower, but not yet. So, use upcoming rallies to lighten up so that when the swine flu of investments hits us the nausea, chills, and aching won't become terminal.

Mister Market Is Laughing At Me

I will never be a great investor because I never follow my convictions and place all my marbles on my view of the future. My hedged bets tend to minimize being right and being wrong. That approach suits me as I sleep well and am still solvent. In the current rally, my stock positions have grown nicely and make me feel good. My cash position, on the other hand, makes me want to go sit in the corner.

As I stare into the corner I calculate how much I could have made had I put all my cash to work in equities. That bothers me. Then I remember how horrible it feels when stock prices tick downward and net worth sinks. An especially sick feeling if you are retired and no longer earn any replenishing investable cash. That's why I attempt to stay cautiously invested. Home runs aren't worth the risks involved.

Within the next six months I'll be happy that I'm not fully invested and I hope that I recognize an appropriate time to pull back from my long positions. I probably won't and that is why market timing is difficult.

JP Morgan is instructive. I should have bought it six months ago. Now it sells at almost its ALL TIME HIGH! Even after the dilution that came from issuing lots of new shares to repay TARP loans. You'd think that all the problems are finished. No, they remain. Now JPM is the best of the big banks, but they are still loaded down with non-performing consumer loans and accelerating losses. Loss Reserves have been built, but they will need further provisioning. The market has been celebrating the slowing of JPM's rate of losses. Losses are still growing, just not as fast! Is that worthy of a stock price that is very near its all time high? I don't think so, but I wish I had bought some six months ago. Now sure isn't the time to buy, but traders are.

Goldman Sachs is a similar story, as are the BRIC and commodity stocks. Their recent results have been astounding. They make me green with envy and feel like donning a dunce cap. Until I think about the likelihood of them remaining at current levels, then I regain some comfort in my liquidity.

A review of a DOW chart of the Great Depression depicts a strong bounce back before returning to lower levels. We've had our bounce back, and it may go higher, but I suggest preparing for a return to bleaker times. I will sleep peacefully, even though I will wish I had made some easy money when Mister Market taunts me.

An Unscientific Examination Of Our Financial Future

Economic and financial education, the financial press, and prayer have failed me. No matter how crusty and savvy I think I am, my results don't equal the image I have of my abilities. While far from prescient, thank God I tend to eke out better results than the professional investment sages. Still, I'm about ready to take up the Maharishi Yogi's Flying Yoga and look for enlightened answers to our investment future.

Where are we headed? Television's talking heads swear it is upward, even though they hedge their verbal bets with a few negatives that could pose problems. Sideline money that needs to be invested, a weak dollar and strong commodities, and momentum are forces that are too strong to stop. The market marches on. Or does it? That's where I wish prayer or Yogi flying would work. Where are we going, because Mama needs new shoes.

Did we overshoot by 50 percent at the nadir? Is cost cutting and an inventory correction worth a 50 percent retracement? Can decent growth in China, Brazil, and India compensate for anemic economic activity in the US and Eurozone? Is deleveraging over or the impact exaggerated? Who knows?

After bouncing up and down on my ass and attempting to fly into meditation, I've come to the following conclusions. We over indulged for too long and we're going to deleverage and suffer for a long time. Our 50% party is overblown and will not last. After a quarter or two of easy comparables fueled by inventory replenishment and cost cutting, we are going to flat line for quite some time. Select companies, in select industries, will do well but the "market" will struggle. Deleveraging is brutal and we haven't experienced brutal yet. Government may slow the process, but they can't stop it, especially since they are attempting to with DEBT!

So, I'm keeping lots of cash and only investing in select stocks that "may" do well despite the upcoming economy. I've kept some emerging markets ETFs and international mutual funds. I've added some short positions and will probably add more, but I scare easily. I'd like clarity, but I can't find any. OM, OM, OM. Off to Fairfield.

TAKE A HEALTHY BITE OF SMART BALANCE

I've owned SMBL on and off over the past several years. The story hasn't changed, but the share price is inching lower. An opportunity is at hand if you can wait five years. Regardless of the "markets" results, Smart Balance will reach $1 Billion, control a significant share of the dairy case, and sell out for a very nice price.

The "story" is one of smart management that has built brands successfully before. Steve Hughes, SMBL CEO, has been the architect of tremendous brand growth at ConAgra, Dean Foods, and Celestial Seasonings. His team has years of experience and the goal of building SMBL into a billion dollar foods concern. They are currently at the $250MM level after several years of business.

Smart Balance is a BRAND. It doesn't own manufacturing or research facilities. It is product, marketing, and people. It makes a little money and generates cash. Enough to paydown it's acquisition debt to $65MM. They should be debt free in a year or so. The lack of manufacturing is an advantage in our current tough times.

At its current share price of $5.90 the stock can be gathered in at a price that is significantly lower than the IPO price, employee options, and the entry points of some of their largest private equity investors. While it isn't at its 2 years low point, it is well off its highs and hasn't participated in the market's run up.

A reasonable plan is to buy some and tuck it away for 5 years. Forget about what the market price is and let Steve Hughes do his magic. Within that timeframe he'll sell the company and you'll end up with a boatload of ConAgra, Kraft, or Heinz shares. That's my bet anyhow.

Banks Require Zero Cost of Funds

It's well known that commercial banks have faced strong headwinds for the past several years. While banking commentators acknowledge that all of the problem mortgage loans haven't been foreclosed yet and commercial real estate problems loom, the industry has been saved by the combined action of the Fed and the Treasury. Share prices have moved dramatically upward off the fear induced bottom. Many seem inclined to believe that there is more upside to be had as long as the Fed keeps interest rates near zero.

Even with a very accommodative Federal Reserve, bank share prices will not stabilize at higher prices. Earnings power is becoming an issue. Where investors were once willing to celebrate the lack of failure and push shares up, they will shortly start to concentrate on what can banks earn with more capital, less leverage, a changed fee and expense structure, and examiners breathing down their backs. The answer is going to be that banks will earn substantially less than at their peak earnings.

Zero interest cost for overnight funds is necessary to offset the following:

1. Continued Loan Loss Reserve funding so mortgages can be foreclosed, HELOCs and credit cards can be written off, and commercial real estate loans restructured. Cummulative LLRs are not adequate to avoid future provisons on a grand scale.

2.Reflecting the above, the FDIC must be refunded and the two year advance premium payment the banks are now required to pay, even with the funny accounting treatment, will impact the banks ability to lend.

3.Regulatory changes in credit card rate changes will start to impact P&Ls.

4.The same will be true for Overdraft Fees, a major source of income for banks.

5.With quality loan demand slack, investment alternatives are not carrying high yields.

Treasuries and Agencies barely exceed overnight funding costs which has pushed bankers into GinnieMaes to find yield.

6.Finally, Regulators are behaving excessively tough on existing portfolios and requiring more reserves for a growing number of loans that are being classified as "substandard". Pressure is not inducive to extending new credit.

Earnings are apt to be "substandard" for banks for the next several years.

Vulcan Appears Vulnerable Again

Vulcan, and other similiar companies, has nearly doubled in the past several months as infrastructure rebuilding and stimulus mania has taken hold. The thesis holds that stimulus funding will fill the hole that developed in residential, commercial, and state road budgets. It won't. At best, it will halt the decline in volume, but it won't get the company on a fast growth track. The price surge reflects the beginning of good times being here again.

In 2007/2008/2009 I rode puts and shorts on both VMC and MLM. It's time to start nibbling at negative bets again as these companies are priced too richly.

AIRLINE SURVIVAL EQUALS DILUTION

Earlier posts have detailed my adventure in owning airline stock. I knew airlines were probably the worst industry to invest in, but Southwest, the best of the worst, was offered at a very attractive price. Rather than thinking, I bought and immediately started losing money. It took about six months of regret before the price returned to my basis. About 90 days after my exit, airline shares started moving upward. Have they ever. The airline ETF, FAA, is up over 100 percent in the last six months!

Does a 100% move mean the industry must be attractive? No, it means that the industry won't go bankrupt in the near term. New equity offerings and sale/leasebacks have raised cash for struggling carriers. Cheesey fees for bags, seat selection, and pets have juiced occupied seat revenue. But it is still a lousy industry. It requires too much capital, has unionized workforces, is subject to large fuel swings, and, mostly, faces pricing pressure from both leisure and business travelers. As usual, the optimists have gotten ahead of themselves and run prices up too fast.

I hope that I've got it right this time. Recently I borrowed some AMR shares and sold them short. American has enough money to continue to bleed for the next year and won't go toes up anytime soon. But it still must service a huge amount of debt, about 10Billion, with terrible operating margins. A difficult task. AMR recently sold equity and diluted the common shareholder, and issued debt at 10.5% for 3 years! They are staying alive, but at an expensive cost.

I think airline shares will go down; I know they won't go up another 100 percent. AMR is about as weak as they get. This time I picked the lousiest company in the lousiest industry and time is on my side.

THE 80/20 RULE MUST NO LONGER APPLY

Awhile back I wrote, in Crusty's How It Ought To Be blog, about two disruptive products that I was using to my advantage. One was a 4.01% checking account from a local credit union. Yes the rate is correct, 4.01% up to $25,000 and still 1% for excess balances. Virtually no difficult requirements attached. only one ACH and 12 debits monthly. My wife is easily up to that task.

My gameplan was to look for other credit unions to replicate the account and put more money to work at 4+%, government insured. I knew of a credit union in eastern Iowa using the same gambit, but paying 5%. But, I haven't gotten around to it yet. Now I won't have to as banking has changed in Omaha.

For the last twenty years most community commercial banks have followed the 80/20 Rule which shows that 2o% of the customers provide 80% of the profit, so raise prices on the 80% to increase their profitability. If they leave, so what as they were not as valuable as the important 20 percent. Bankers catered to the better off and sent the smaller balance accounts off to the savings & loans and credit unions.

The result was increased profitability and chest pounding. But now, twenty yeaars later, lobbies and drive thru lanes are empty and bankers have found customer numbers hard to increase. Not so at the financial institutions that enjoyed the customer traffic. Account balances were small and activity high, but they pay fees and take out loans. Bankers have started to take notice.

Proof of a changed approach is a new account from my local bank. IT'S THE SAME PACKAGE AS THE CREDIT UNION! Except that they are paying 4.05%. Other banks won't be far behind and I won't have to open an account in eastern Iowa. Since my wife is up to making sure we use our debit card enough times to keep the banks happy, we'll be opening accounts whenever the banks change their attitude. When we head to Florida for the winter I'm hopeful of finding a similiar banking climate.

4 percent, FDIC insured, is an attractive yield as it certainly beats by a large margin normal bank rates on money market savings and certificates of deposit. It also yields more than a 10 year Treasury and other bonds, plus you don't risk loss of face value due to rising rates. You can earn a 3% dividend on some solid common stocks, but not without the risk that the stock price will go lower with the next correction.

Moderation and balance is always the right plan and these accounts are attractive. Add them to dividend paying stocks along with some bonds and you have a good cushion for a stock portfolio.